MANIFESTO OF A MADMAN PART 12
SOUR NOTE
FACE OF EVIL
549. Welcome everyone to today’s Blog. As we get closer to the end of deciphering this letter that the Mayor dropped to City Council on Dec 6, 2022 only a couple of hours before their meeting, he seems to be ramping up his nonsense to an even higher level of vitriol and lies. And by the way don’t forget what he said when he got his assistant Rebecca Scherf to send a letter to Jordan canceling their meeting(because the spineless lizard didn’t have the guts to do it himself) and saying that he would let council decide the outcome of the license. That meeting was postponed twice and on both occasions he was in town. We covered that on Blog 41 and 49. We even published his schedule to prove it. Another lie by the gutless serial liar himself. He really is a clinical imbecile and an intellectual and moral pygmy.
PYGMY GOAT
PYGMY MAYOR
PYGMY HIPPO
NOT A REAL PYGMY GOAT
TOM BRADY--REAL GOAT
550. Now back to the letter from hell.
“MANIFESTO OF A MADMAN.”
THE LONG LETTER
The Mayor said the following which deserves another Man-Child moment:
“Ms. Wheat's proposal describes the exact same establishment as the Palace Bar but with a new name and minor changes in decor. It describes a loud, late night bar with "a touch of the old Palace Bar". While she envisions major renovations and upgrades in the future, she cannot afford these changes and the proposal does not plan to achieve them within the first year.”
COMMENTS
551. WTF does “It describes a loud, late night bar with "a touch of the old Palace Bar" mean? Well we will start with “Loud’. Some bars have live music. We don’t. Others have D J's. We don’t. Almost all have jukeboxes and some of those are hooked into intricate sound systems. We have a jukebox with regular speakers. And by the way if you have a bar and you don’t have a jukebox, you may want to consider shutting your doors.
Then he goes on to say “late night bar“. We were open 10:AM till 2:AM seven days a week(2:30AM on Fri. and Sat).” Many, if not most bars in town are open similar hours.
He likes to use words to make something normal sound or look like a bad thing.
He then said "a touch of the old Palace Bar". Another line to suggest something bad.
Because we wanted to find any reason, no matter what, to shut us down. No matter how weak the facts and truth were.
552. Then he said:
“While she envisions major renovations and upgrades in the future, she cannot afford these changes and the proposal does not plan to achieve them within the first year.”
COMMENTS
I want to start off by saying that once my license was out of the picture I told Jordan that I no longer thought that my involvement would not be of any benefit to her and quite frankly I was sick and tired with the whole administration of this city. I just wanted to concentrate on getting my house ready to sell and get the hell out of Superior. And that is exactly what I did. I moved to Nevada in October, 2022. Of course I talked to Jordan occasionally but for the most part I was out of the picture. But I will let Jordan describe the situation to you in her words below:
I remember him calling the bar dark not loud. And I told him that I wanted to keep the big Palace sign because that was cool. I wanted to change the name, change the colors. Yes the bar itself would've stayed the same because nothing was wrong with it, but the decor would've change to make it "different bar"
He was trying to tell me that I had to have major construction in order for it to be considered a new bar and I was like why I don't wanna do major construction. There's nothing that needs to be majorly changed. All I wanted to do is cosmetic changes.
And I was like well I can't afford to do major changes like construction, but yeah, I wanna change the signs change the name that kind of stuff would've all been done in the first year would've been done before I was opened.
COMMENTS
Then she submitted him a plan, requested and required by Mayor Paine, that she had put together below. Just so you know, I had no input at all in this plan and never even saw it until after she submitted it to the city. And by the way I would like to see a plan from any other bar in Superior that was required by Jim Paine in order to get a license.
553.
COMMENTS
I don’t know about you folks, but I think she did a very impressive, thorough and thoughtful job. On the next Blog we will examine what Mayor Paine thought about it.
CHANGING TOPICS
I will leave you today with a story below from my hometown of Ottawa, Canada your Communist neighbors to the north. We left there over 30 years ago. Our two daughters were 4 and 2 years old. I moved to the USA because Canada was heading towards socialism and I wanted them to have a better life. But now it seems that they are really now getting closer towards communism. This story below was published from one of our local newspapers, the Ottawa Sun this week and yes you can be fined up to $100,000.00 for idling your car. What a bunch of morons.
Possible new anti-idling rule in Ottawa would bring $100K fines
Proposed penalties would range from a warning to a minimum fine of $500, ranging up to a maximum of $100,000.
Author of the article:
Published Sep 15, 2024
City councillors are considering tougher anti-idling bylaws as a way of improving air quality and reducing greenhouse gas emissions in Ottawa.
And it’s not just idle talk. A motion to be debated this week proposes to make it illegal to idle a vehicle for more than one minute in any 60-minute period. When it’s below freezing or warmer than 27 C, that limit would be five minutes to allow time to defrost windows or cool the vehicle with air conditioning.
The motion will be discussed Thursday at a special joint meeting of the Environment and Climate Change, and the Emergency Preparedness and Protective Services committees
Ottawa’s current bylaw has been in place since 2007 and limits idling to three minutes. But that’s fallen out of line with other major cities such as Toronto, Burlington, Kingston and Vancouver, which have adopted a one-minute maximum. The Montreal borough of Outremont limits idling to 10 seconds, with a $150 fine for offenders.
Penalties in the Ottawa proposal would range from a warning to a minimum fine of $500, ranging up to a maximum of $100,000 “where continued or egregious non-compliance is occurring.” When the proposal to toughen the idling bylaw first came to council in 2022, it mentioned that higher fines for idling was one of the tactics used to counter the three-week convoy occupation of downtown Ottawa in February 2022.
There are plenty of exceptions allowed in the current bylaw that would be continued under the new proposal. You won’t be ticketed if you’re idling while stuck in traffic — or in a drive-through lane. Emergency vehicles are excluded, as are public transit and private transit vehicles (school buses and tour buses, for example), vehicles engaged in farming, police vehicles since they need to keep their onboard computers powered, mobile workshops, vehicles being repaired and armoured vehicles. Anyone with a doctor’s note saying they must be in a climate-controlled vehicle will also be exempt.
IF this happens you the taxpayer will be on the hook one way or the other because they don’t pay property taxes. I got this on Google:
As a result, their vast property holdings are exempt from taxation in all 50 states. The rationale for this status is that higher education is an inherent public good.
See you all soon on the next Blog,
Brian
While CAFES is pleased with the proposed bylaw, Keller-Herzog called it a “partial success.”
“Obviously, there are vulnerable populations that we need to be concerned about. Around schoolyards, we think there should be signage and more education. When you have caregivers and parents dropping off and picking up kids, they should not all be standing around with engines running, polluting the air. When kids are there and that pollution is going straight into their lungs — that’s reprehensible.”
She’d like to see the city commit some money to more signs, more education and more enforcement.
“If you have a bylaw where the only purpose is to encourage good behaviour, but if there’s gross abuses there’s no mechanism to enforce it, that’s kind of useless,” she said
“We’re not after random small infractions. But if there is systematic, repeat behaviour — say the same delivery truck always idling or a driver who finds a nice shady spot on a street and takes a nap with the engine running — I think that’s where residents should have recourse,” Keller-Herzog said. “Not everyone’s comfortable knocking on someone’s car window. There should be a response from (a call to) 311.”
COMMENTS
Now you know why I left. These people have completely lost touch with reality.
And don’t forget the wise words of Billy Idol. “If you go to Canada, don’t idle”.
See you on the next Blog.
Brian
